Litigation-I Win, You Lose vs. Mediation-Win/Win

Image
  Litigation is a zero-sum game.  It destroys relationships and fosters enmity between the parties.  Parties rarely walk away happy.  Even if they win, the expense of litigation is enormous, and collecting on judgments is difficult. Disputes ultimately resolve, but the focus on winning at any cost can lead to prolonged legal battles.  Living with a lawsuit causes ongoing stress, which can distract you from your business and even have an effect on your health. In a courtroom, the final decision lies with a judge or jury who may not fully grasp the complexities of the case. Parties relinquish control over the outcome, potentially leaving them dissatisfied with the final judgment. Mediation has the opposite effect.   Rather than polarizing people, it enables the parties to attack the issues and not each other.     The process promotes open communication, collaboration and problem-solving, which enables parties to actively participate in crafting mutually beneficial solutions.   It res

Green Building Disputes Prompt Lawsuits-from environmentalleader.com

Green Building Disputes Prompt Lawsuits

usgbclogoLawsuits and claims are emerging as businesses embrace “green” building and other sustainable processes, says Harvey Berman, a partner at the law firm of Bodman LLP, in an article for the Ann Arbor Business Review.

Berman said the first reported lawsuit involving a green building is believed to be a case filed in Maryland by a contractor against a developer. The developer alleged that the contract which included the project manual and specifications required that the contractor construct an environmentally sound “green building” in conformance with a Silver Certification Level according to U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) Rating System, said Berman.

The contract documents attached to the developer’s counterclaim contained no provisions limiting the contractor’s liability relating to any “green building” aspects of the project, did not discuss the role of the developer or the design/construction team regarding the LEED certification and did not discuss the LEED process or the effect of a project delay on the attainment of tax credit but the contract did contain a construction time limit of 336 days.

Since most green building standards involve some type of incentive for building green, there is an inherent potential liability for design professionals and contractors if an owner does not achieve the required “green” certification, warned Berman.

The second reported lawsuit involves the City of Albuquerque, N.M.’s enactment of a new green building law including an Energy Conservation Code and a High Performance Buildings Ordinance.

This lawsuit, which is still ongoing, alleges that a federal law, Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, preempts the city’s new green building law. The plaintiffs claimed that the increased requirements of the new Albuquerque green law would prohibit them from selling or installing residential or commercial HVAC products and water heaters for use in the city that do not meet the requirements of the new law, said Berman.

Berman’s lessons learned: Parties involved in a green building project should carefully review their contracts for potential liability arising from green certification requirements, and municipalities adopting green building laws should take special care to avoid laws that violate or conflict with other existing or superseding laws.

The rise of carbon offset companies is also resulting in some misrepresentation. In some cases, carbon offset companies are double or even triple counting carbon credits and offsets, according to the Coyote Blog.

One example cited is My Emissions Exchange. Here, the carbon credits are equal to a one-ton reduction in carbon emission, and are currently trading between $10 and $25, according to the site, said the blog. The blogger says the exchange makes no differentiation for how one’s power is generated, which translates into “soft” savings as real credits to be paid for.

Popular posts from this blog

Eligibility Requirements for the LEED Green Associate Exam from Green Building Education and Training

What are the eligibility requirements for the LEED Green Associate exam? http://www.green-buildings.com/content/78626-what-are-eligibility-requirements-leed-green-associate-exam After March 31st, 2009, candidates for the LEED Green Associate (GA) credentials must fulfill eligibility requirements. LEED Green Associate candidates are required to do ONE (1) of the following: Option 1: You must be (or have previously been) employed in a sustainable field of work This is perhaps one of the more nebulous requirements posed by the GBCI, because no definition of a "sustainable field of work" is given. The USGBC does state that the company needs to "relate to environmentalism or the green building industry". If you are in any doubt that your profession would qualify, contact the GBCI at gbci.org or by calling 1-800-795-1746. Option 2: You must be (or have been) involved in a LEED Certification Project To prove eligibility by way of LEED project involvement, you must have bee
Read more

EPA Starts Assessing Fines for RRP Violations

From Mark Paskell's blog:  http://www.thecontractorcoachingpartnership.com/Blog-Contractor-Coaching--Construction-Business-Coach-EPA-RRP-Lead-Rule/ The press release below came from the EPA.  It has been hard to persuade contractors that they need to become certified when it did not appear that the Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule was being enforced.  Now, there have been two substantial fines publicized: one in Connecticut last month ($30,700) and the one listed below.  It is time to have your contracts reviewed, insert clauses to protect you under the new law, and have your insurance policy reviewed for lead coverage! Kansas City, Kan., March 31, 2011) – Window World of St. Louis, Inc., has agreed to pay a $19,529 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it failed to notify owners and occupants of at least 20 St. Louis area residential properties built before 1978 of lead-based paint risks prior to performing renovation work at those locations. Accordi
Read more

Should a Contractor Have the Homeowner Test for Lead?

I would like to learn more about the advisability of lead testing.  Homeowners might not want their homes tested for lead, because it becomes public record, and may interfere with the sale of a home or the ability to obtain a mortgage or homeowners insurance.  In addition, I strongly advise contractors not to do the testing themselves.  Let the homeowner pay an independent company to do it.  Otherwise if the GC brings a claim against a lead testing company for a false negative, the company might state that the GC did not use the test kit properly.  If the homeowner does have the house tested, consider refusing to do the work unless the homeowner has lead abatement work done.
Read more