Litigation-I Win, You Lose vs. Mediation-Win/Win

Image
  Litigation is a zero-sum game.  It destroys relationships and fosters enmity between the parties.  Parties rarely walk away happy.  Even if they win, the expense of litigation is enormous, and collecting on judgments is difficult. Disputes ultimately resolve, but the focus on winning at any cost can lead to prolonged legal battles.  Living with a lawsuit causes ongoing stress, which can distract you from your business and even have an effect on your health. In a courtroom, the final decision lies with a judge or jury who may not fully grasp the complexities of the case. Parties relinquish control over the outcome, potentially leaving them dissatisfied with the final judgment. Mediation has the opposite effect.   Rather than polarizing people, it enables the parties to attack the issues and not each other.     The process promotes open communication, collaboration and problem-solving, which enables parties to actively participate in crafting mutually beneficial solutions.   It res

The Massachusetts Lead Paint Law Hearing-Audience Commentary

The testimony at the hearing conducted by the Division of Occupational Safety raised a lot of important issues and suggestions for the Massachusetts Lead Law.  Commentary included the following:

1.  Create a forum for dialogue where contractors can ask questions without fear of reprisal.
2.  How does a contractor handle a conflict between OSHA and the RRP Rule?
3.  Provide a means for looking up lead-paint certification online.
4. How will liability be allocated between subcontractors and contractors?
5. Why hasn't the huge rental-housing community been targeted?
6.  Is power-washing allowed under the MA law?
7.  It is important to allow access and training for apprentices and students under the age of 18.
8.  MA should lobby with insurance companies to include lead coverage in their policies.
9.  A task force of trade professionals should be created to address lead and other issues.
10.  This law is overly onerous for the small contractor.
11.  Contractors should not be put in the position where they are the ones educating homeowners about this law.
12.  Those with high lead levels should have to present their claims to a tribunal before filing suit.  If the contractor can show that he followed the lead-safe practices, then the suit should not be allowed to go forward.
13.  Most were in favor of Massachusetts taking over administration of the law.  Having the MA law in effect would prevent suits from being filed in federal court and would keep adjudication of construction and lead claims in Massachusetts courts.
14.  Finally, homeowners and contractors alike should be held accountable for trying to circumvent the law.

Popular posts from this blog

Eligibility Requirements for the LEED Green Associate Exam from Green Building Education and Training

EPA Starts Assessing Fines for RRP Violations

Should a Contractor Have the Homeowner Test for Lead?